Trend

Salesforce CPQ Is Officially End-of-Sale

Here's What That Means for Your Revenue Operations

Mar 2025
Salesforce CPQ end of sale
None
end-of-life date announced
$200
Revenue Cloud Advanced, per user per month
4–8 weeks
Salesforce CPQ → Kugamon

By Kuldip HillyerPublished Mar 30, 2026Updated Sep 16, 202610 min read

Salesforce CPQ Is End-of-Sale: What It Means and What to Do Next

Dec 23, 2015
SteelBrick acquisition announced
Salesforce agrees to acquire SteelBrick; its package becomes Salesforce CPQ and keeps the SBQQ namespace (Forbes).
Mar 2025
End of sale
No new licences to new customers. Existing customers keep, renew, add users and get support (Salesforce).
Jul 10, 2026
Salesforce’s end-of-sale article
“Product End of Sale (Not End of Life)”: maintenance phase, no forced migration, Revenue Cloud Advanced named as successor (Salesforce).
Jul 2026
Online help retired
CPQ help articles replaced by a single PDF (KB 005388761).
Not announced
End of life
No date. Salesforce’s retirement philosophy requires notice before one is set (Salesforce).

Every dated milestone in Salesforce CPQ’s life, and the one that has not happened.

The Situation

In March 2025, Salesforce confirmed that Salesforce CPQ had entered end-of-sale status — no new licenses for new customers (Salesforce's explainer: end of sale, not end of life). If you've been using CPQ, you've likely received communications about this shift. The reaction from the market has been mixed—some users view it as a natural evolution, others as an abrupt disruption. The reality sits somewhere between.

This page cuts through the uncertainty. We'll walk through what happened, why it happened, what your options are, and how to evaluate them without letting urgency drive bad decisions.

What Actually Happened

Salesforce's CPQ product isn't disappearing. Instead, Salesforce has consolidated its quote-to-cash strategy around Revenue Cloud Advanced, their newer platform built on modern architecture. Revenue Cloud Advanced includes CPQ functionality—quote generation, approval workflows, e-signature integration, and reporting—but packaged differently. Related: Salesforce CPQ vs Revenue Cloud Advanced, side by side.

Existing CPQ licenses remain supported for the duration of existing contracts at no extra cost — Salesforce has announced no support-cutoff date. That gives you room to plan and execute a migration on your own schedule if you choose to move.

Why the shift? Salesforce wants to centralize investment in a single platform rather than maintain parallel products. Revenue Cloud Advanced is more cloud-native and has different licensing. This isn't personal; it's standard consolidation in enterprise software.

The Timeline You Need to Know

Key Dates

Event

Date

End-of-Sale Announced

March 2025

CPQ Sales Stopped

March 2025

Support Cutoff

None announced — support continues for existing contracts

End-of-life date

None announced — Salesforce has committed to support for the duration of existing contracts

Support means Salesforce will fix critical bugs and maintain platform compatibility for the duration of your existing contract, and the full end-of-sale timeline lays the dates out in order. No support-cutoff date has been announced, but CPQ is in maintenance mode: features are frozen and documentation has been reduced (Salesforce retired the online CPQ documentation in July 2026 in favor of a single PDF — KB 005388761).

What This Means for Your Organization

Your CPQ instance continues to work after March 2025. Nothing stops working on that date. The question is support and future-proofing.

If you stay on CPQ:

  • You have a stable, known system for the duration of your existing contract.
  • Salesforce will fix critical bugs and maintain backward compatibility with platform updates for the duration of your existing contract.
  • New features won't come. CPQ is in maintenance mode.
  • No support-cutoff date has been announced, but the longer you stay on a product in maintenance mode, the more operational risk you carry as the Salesforce core platform and ecosystem tools move on.
  • Eventually, you'll migrate. The only question is timing.

If you migrate to Revenue Cloud Advanced:

  • You stay on Salesforce's modern path. RCA will receive feature investment.
  • Quote workflows move to a new interface. Training required.
  • Existing customizations may require rework. Salesforce provides no first-party migration tool — the move is a reimplementation — though it points customers to partner-built accelerators (Forsys RevRamp, IdeaHelix, Prodly).
  • RCA is priced per user — $200 per user per month at list, or $150 for the Growth edition (Salesforce pricing) — versus the roughly $75 per user historically quoted for Salesforce CPQ. Budget impact varies.

If you switch to a third-party alternative:

  • You evaluate a new vendor's roadmap, support quality, and ecosystem fit.
  • You keep your Salesforce org and use the third-party tool for quote-to-cash workflows.
  • Integration is key. How deeply does the tool connect to your data?
  • Some alternatives include Kugamon, Conga, Dealhub, and others. We compare seven options — including Revenue Cloud Advanced, Nue, Zuora, and staying put — in our guide to Salesforce CPQ alternatives. Each has different strengths.

Your Three Paths Forward

Path 1: Stay on Salesforce CPQ for Now

This works if you're comfortable running a maintenance-mode product and your processes are stable. With no support-cutoff date announced, you have time to evaluate options without pressure, to improve your CPQ processes, or to prepare for migration.

Risks: You'll eventually need to migrate anyway. Waiting until the last year creates urgency and limits options. Longer you stay, larger the potential gap between CPQ and whatever replaces it.

Best for: Organizations with stable quote workflows, low customization, or budget constraints now.

Path 2: Migrate to Revenue Cloud Advanced

Salesforce's native path. You stay within the Salesforce ecosystem, and the company invests in RCA's future.

Considerations: RCA is modern but different. If you've heavily customized CPQ, migration is non-trivial. Pricing is per user ($200 per user per month at list), so budget impact must be calculated. There is no first-party Salesforce migration tool; partner accelerators help, but the move still requires time and expertise.

Best for: Organizations already on modern Salesforce with straightforward CPQ setups, or those committed to Salesforce long-term.

Path 3: Switch to an Alternative (Kugamon, Conga, DealHub, Custom, etc.)

You maintain your Salesforce org and use a specialized CPQ tool built for the Salesforce ecosystem. This approach often preserves your customizations and Salesforce data model.

Considerations: You're adding a vendor relationship. Integration must be solid. Evaluate support quality, roadmap alignment with your needs, and total cost of ownership against RCA and CPQ.

Best for: Organizations wanting to stay on Salesforce, keep existing customizations, or seeking a best-of-breed CPQ with stronger subscription management or configure-price-quote features.

Migration Options Comparison

Factor Revenue Cloud Advanced Kugamon Conga Build Custom

Salesforce Native

Subscription Management

Basic

via add-on

Custom build

CPQ Feature Parity

High

High

High

Depends

Data Portability

Standard

High (Salesforce-native)

Standard

Full control

Implementation Time

12-18 months

4-8 weeks

3-6 months

6+ months

Support Quality

Salesforce standard

Dedicated ISV support

Vendor support

Internal/contractor

Long-Term Investment

What to Evaluate in a Replacement

If you're moving away from CPQ, here's what matters:

1. Quote Workflow Alignment

Does the tool match how you quote? Dynamic pricing, approval routing, e-signature, document generation, version control? Test with your actual workflows, not defaults.

2. Salesforce Integration Depth

How tightly does it connect to your Salesforce data? Can it read account hierarchies, sync pricing, auto-update records? Loose integration creates manual work.

3. Customization Without Code

CPQ lets you customize pricing rules, approval logic, and fields without heavy code. Does the replacement? How steep is the learning curve?

4. Subscription & Recurring Revenue

If you manage subscriptions, renewals, or usage-based billing, ensure the tool handles that. Many CPQ replacements don't. Kugamon and Model N do; RCA's subscription capabilities are newer.

5. Reporting & Analytics

You need visibility into quote-to-cash cycle time, win rates, approval bottlenecks, and revenue impact. Is the tool's reporting intuitive, or does everything require custom dashboards?

6. Contract Lifecycle Management

Quoting is one step. What about contract generation, amendment tracking, e-signature, and archival? Does the tool own that, or do you integrate Docusign or similar?

7. Vendor Stability & Roadmap

Is the vendor investing in the product? Check recent releases, user community activity, and leadership statements. A tool on life support isn't worth migrating to.

8. Migration Support

How much does the vendor help you move data, train users, and validate the new system? This is often underestimated and critical to success.

Feature Parity Checklist

Feature RCA Kugamon Conga

Dynamic Pricing

Discount Management

Multi-Step Approval

E-Signature Integration

Quote Templates

Revenue Management

Basic

via add-on

Subscription Management

New

via add-on

How to Plan Your Migration

Phase 1: Assess (Months 1–2)

Audit your current CPQ setup. How many custom pricing rules, workflows, approval paths, and integrations do you have? What's working well, and what's been a headache? This informs what you need from a replacement.

Interview stakeholders: sales operations, finance, legal, IT. Each group has different priorities.

Phase 2: Evaluate (Months 2–3)

Run demos with your top 2–3 candidates. Use real quote scenarios, not defaults. Ask vendors about migration support, timeline, and training.

Calculate total cost of ownership: software, implementation, training, and post-go-live support.

Phase 3: Decide (Month 4)

Pick your path: RCA, a third-party alternative, or stay on CPQ longer. Document the rationale for stakeholder buy-in.

Phase 4: Plan (Months 4–6)

If migrating, work with the vendor to build a detailed migration plan. Data mapping, testing cycles, cutover strategy, rollback plan.

Designate a project lead. This matters.

Phase 5: Execute (Months 6–12)

Stand up the new system. Run parallel testing. Train users. Validate data integrity.

Plan for cutover during a low-volume period. Have a support plan post-go-live.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I run CPQ and my new system in parallel during migration?

Sometimes, but it's messy. Quote data gets out of sync quickly. Plan for a cutover date rather than a long overlap. Most teams switch systems and maintain read-only access to CPQ data for 30–90 days as a safety net.

Q: Will I lose historical quote data when I migrate?

No. Historical quote records stay in Salesforce or get archived. The new system starts fresh with ongoing quotes. Some teams export CPQ history as read-only records for audit purposes.

Q: What happens to my approvers and custom workflows?

These need to be rebuilt in the new system. It's not automatic. This is often the longest part of migration. Talk to the vendor about how they handle complex approval logic.

Q: Will Salesforce force us to upgrade to RCA if we stay on CPQ?

No. Salesforce won't auto-upgrade your org — this is end of sale versus end of life, and you choose when and how to move. That said, Salesforce has announced no support-cutoff date — support continues for the duration of existing contracts — but staying long-term on a product in maintenance mode carries operational risk.

Q: How long will Salesforce support CPQ?

Salesforce has committed to supporting CPQ for the duration of existing contracts and has announced no end-of-life or support-cutoff date. Plan around product maintenance mode — frozen features and reduced documentation — rather than a deadline.

Q: How much will migration cost?

Typically $50K–$300K depending on complexity, team size, and vendor. Budget for software, implementation labor, training, and contingency. Ask vendors for reference customers and real project costs, not templates.

Q: Should we build a custom solution instead of buying a CPQ tool?

Rarely. Custom quoting logic is harder to maintain than it looks. Approval workflows, pricing rules, and tax calculations create ongoing technical debt. Unless you have specific, unusual needs, a vendor solution is lower risk and faster to deploy.

Q: What if we merge with another company on a different CPQ system?

CPQ consolidation after M&A is painful. If that's in your future, factor it into your replacement decision. Some tools integrate multiple instances better than others.

Q: Can we test a new CPQ system in a sandbox first?

Yes. Most vendors allow a sandbox or trial environment. Use it to validate workflows, integrations, and data mapping before committing to production implementation. More: all 38 migration questions.

What Kugamon Offers

Kugamon is a Salesforce-native CPQ and subscription management platform built for organizations managing complex quotes, subscriptions, and revenue recognition. We've served 150+ companies since 2009 and hold a 4.9-star rating across 130+ public reviews on the Salesforce AppExchange.

If you're evaluating alternatives, here's what we do well:

  • Subscription management is built in. Most CPQ tools treat subscriptions as an add-on; we've integrated it from the ground up.
  • Revenue recognition is native. If you manage complex deals with deferred revenue, ASC 606 compliance, or usage-based billing, it's handled.
  • Salesforce-native. Your data stays in Salesforce. You're not syncing between systems constantly.
  • Configurable without code. Pricing rules, approval workflows, and quote logic can be configured using a UI, not Apex.
  • Migration support. We've moved customers off CPQ, Conga, and custom systems. We know the pain points.

We're not the only option, and we don't pretend to be. If you need a Salesforce-native tool with strong subscription capabilities, we're worth a conversation.

Next Steps

Here's what to do this week:

  • Audit your CPQ setup. How complex is it? What's working, and what's not?
  • Talk to your team. Sales, finance, and legal need input. Don't decide in a vacuum.
  • Review the timeline above. Plan your migration on your own schedule rather than waiting for a deadline to force it.
  • Run a demo or proof-of-concept with your top 1–2 candidates.
  • Set a decision date. Don't let this drag on indefinitely.

Evaluating your options? Visit transition.kugamon.com for a side-by-side comparison of every CPQ migration path, or read our guide to Salesforce CPQ alternatives. Start with the migration playbook from Salesforce CPQ.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Sometimes, but it's messy. Quote data gets out of sync quickly. Plan for a cutover date rather than a long overlap. Most teams switch systems and maintain read-only access to CPQ data for 30–90 days as a safety net.

No. Historical quote records stay in Salesforce or get archived. The new system starts fresh with ongoing quotes. Some teams export CPQ history as read-only records for audit purposes.

These need to be rebuilt in the new system. It's not automatic. This is often the longest part of migration. Talk to the vendor about how they handle complex approval logic.

No. Salesforce won't auto-upgrade your org. You choose when and how to move. That said, Salesforce has announced no support-cutoff date — support continues for the duration of existing contracts — but staying long-term on a product in maintenance mode carries operational risk.

Salesforce has committed to supporting CPQ for the duration of existing contracts and has announced no end-of-life or support-cutoff date. Plan around product maintenance mode — frozen features and reduced documentation — rather than a deadline.

Typically $50K–$300K depending on complexity, team size, and vendor. Budget for software, implementation labor, training, and contingency. Ask vendors for reference customers and real project costs, not templates.

Rarely. Custom quoting logic is harder to maintain than it looks. Approval workflows, pricing rules, and tax calculations create ongoing technical debt. Unless you have specific, unusual needs, a vendor solution is lower risk and faster to deploy.

Next step

Ready to see it inside Salesforce?

Thirty minutes on your data with someone who has done this before. No pitch — just honest guidance.